The Forestry Forum is sponsored in part by:

TURBOSAWMILL GIANT SALE ON NOW UNTIL OCTOBER 31st


Forestry Forum
Sponsored by:


TimberKing Sawmills



Toll Free 1-800-582-0470

LogRite Tools



Norwood Industries Inc.


Sawmill & Woodlot Magazine



Your source for Portable Sawmills, Edgers, Resaws, Sharpeners, Setters, Bandsaw Blades and Sawmill Parts

EZ Boardwalk Sawmills. More Saw For Less Money!

STIHLDealers.com sponsored by Northeast STIHL


Woodland Sawmills

Peterson Swingmills

 KASCO SharpTech WoodMaxx Blades

Turbosawmill

Sawmill Exchange

BRUTE FORCE Authorized Dealer

Woodshax Outdoor Vending Solutions

FARMA


Council Tool

Baker Products

ECHO-Bearcat



Author Topic: Woodmizer LT35 vs Timber King 1600  (Read 1470 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline Poplarpete

  • member
  • *
  • Posts: 2
  • Age: 59
  • Location: North Carolina
  • Gender: Male
  • I'm new!
    • Share Post
Woodmizer LT35 vs Timber King 1600
« on: October 09, 2018, 06:37:21 PM »
I've narrowed it down to these 2. I've seen the WM up close and personal, TK only by video. WM is a little less $. 1 specific concern is the single rail cantilever with the WM. Does it bounce? Any other thoughts about the mills greatly appreciated. BTW, I this will be my 1st sawmill.

Offline Busysawyer

  • Senior Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 366
  • Age: 40
  • Location: West mi
  • Gender: Male
  • I'm new!
    • Share Post
Re: Woodmizer LT35 vs Timber King 1600
« Reply #1 on: October 09, 2018, 06:57:42 PM »
My super 70 bounces but not in the cut. It cuts very accurately.  The cantilever head allows you to cut much bigger than the same size twin rail mill will. 
Even a blind squirrel finds a nut every once in awhile

Offline WV Sawmiller

  • Senior Member x2
  • *****
  • Posts: 4980
  • Age: 65
  • Location: Hinton WV
  • Gender: Male
    • Share Post
    • Green's Sawmill Services
Re: Woodmizer LT35 vs Timber King 1600
« Reply #2 on: October 09, 2018, 07:05:02 PM »
    If you have that as a worry i suggest you watch the LT35 in action some more to set your mind at ease. TK makes a very good machine and my only beef with them is they spend too much time downplaying the cantilever design. I love my LT35 and have nothing but good things to say about it. I wish it had a wider cut and more horsepower but for the price I paid I am well satisfied. I like the extra options as to off bearing from more places (Either end, either side). Also it has held its value well and I always have the option of upgrading. My machine already far exceeds my material handling capabilities which need to be examined in conjunction with your mills capabilities IMHO. Good luck and I am sure you will be happy whichever way you go.

   BTW - I have never had a bounce problem IRT your specific question.
Howard Green
WM LT35HDG25(2015) , 2009 4wd Dodge PU, Kawasaki 650 ATV, Sthil 440 & 441, homemade logging arch (w/custom built rear log dolly), JD 750 w/4' wide Bushhog brand FEL

Dad always said "You can shear a sheep a bunch of times but you can only skin him once"

Offline WDH

  • Forester
  • Administrator
  • *****
  • Posts: 27608
  • Age: 64
  • Location: Perry, GA
  • Gender: Male
  • April 1998 - August 2008
    • Share Post
    • hamsleyhardwood.com
Re: Woodmizer LT35 vs Timber King 1600
« Reply #3 on: October 09, 2018, 08:07:39 PM »
The Woodmizer cantilever design is decades proven.  Decades. 
Woodmizer LT40HDD35, John Deere 2155, Kubota M5640SU, Nyle L53 Dehumidification Kiln, and a passion for all things with leafs, twigs, and bark.  hamsleyhardwood.com

Offline PAmizerman

  • Senior Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 309
  • Age: 26
  • Location: Loretto PA
  • Gender: Male
  • Just Another Day In Paradise!!
    • Share Post
Re: Woodmizer LT35 vs Timber King 1600
« Reply #4 on: October 09, 2018, 08:15:49 PM »
If the cantilever head was a problem WM 
Wouldn't be selling thousands of mills.
I think other companies are just sore that WM pantented it and they can't use it.
Woodmizer lt40 super remote 42hp Kubota diesel. Accuset II
Traverse 6035 telehandler and a lot of back breaking work!!

Offline Bruno of NH

  • Senior Member x2
  • *****
  • Posts: 2415
  • Age: 52
  • Location: Springfield NH
  • Gender: Male
    • Share Post
Re: Woodmizer LT35 vs Timber King 1600
« Reply #5 on: October 09, 2018, 08:24:24 PM »
I seen a 1987 lt 40 with the original owner cutting some nice pine at my benefit sawing project.
And 3 other lt 40's going hard and not one bad piece of lumber.
I'm a believer
thomas 8013 mill ,Mahindra 3540 cab tractor loader  Dump trailer  and lot of contracting tools

Offline Outlaw

  • member
  • *
  • Posts: 18
  • Age: 40
  • Location: Northern Minnesota
  • Gender: Male
  • I'm new!
    • Share Post
Re: Woodmizer LT35 vs Timber King 1600
« Reply #6 on: October 09, 2018, 08:55:38 PM »
If you let everyone know where you live, there might be some kind owners let you take a look at their mill.  

Offline Chaser357

  • member
  • *
  • Posts: 14
  • Age: 40
  • Location: Lawley, AL
  • Gender: Male
    • Share Post
Re: Woodmizer LT35 vs Timber King 1600
« Reply #7 on: October 09, 2018, 09:38:29 PM »
I have a TK1600.  The company has been great to deal with. Wood Mizer is too because I have had an orange mill too.   

What I like about my mill that the WM doesn’t have (standard).   

Chain log turner
Fine adjust outriggers
Very simple hydraulics and very little electronics
36” log capacity with about 32” between the guides
A little more horsepower
I can buy parts pretty much anywhere

What I don’t like about my mill that WM has.

Hydraulic toe boards
Hydraulic back stops
Hydraulic clamp (up and down)

If the TK had these three things I would say no question get the TK but it doesn’t so you will have to decide what is most important to you.  I will say both are great companies and you will be happy with either one.  I wouldn’t worry about the head design so much.   If it was a problem you would have heard about it by now. 

Offline Southside logger

  • Senior Member x2
  • *****
  • Posts: 2875
  • Age: 46
  • Location: Wilsons (Dinwiddie County), VA
  • Gender: Male
  • Have a plan to saw every log you meet.
    • Share Post
Re: Woodmizer LT35 vs Timber King 1600
« Reply #8 on: October 09, 2018, 10:18:17 PM »
I have a 35 and run it hard, it is a critical component of my primary income.  There is zero issue with the single mast and no bounce at all when cutting.  In addition to lumber and beams I produce flooring, shiplap, v-match, and other finished profiles, inconsistent lumber would be a serious problem for me.  I think TK is a great company as I have some of their sister company equipment that is used in down stream processing, great customer service and great products.

Yesterday I had to profile a shipment of shiplap, and the customer wanted a skip plane finish - it was a royal pain to make it come out right because my rough sawn material was so consistent that trying to get the perfect skip look was all but impossible.  

Ironically, I am right now in the process of buying a second mill and this one will be orange due to the benefits of the cantilever design and WM's powerful, yet simple to operate advanced set works.  Woodmizer does have an unfair advantage with the cantilever design, but they came up with it and made it work, Ad Victorem Spolias.
Franklin buncher and skidder
JD Processor
Woodmizer LT35 sawmill, KD250 kiln, BMS 250 sharpener and setter
Riehl Edger
Woodmaster 725 and 4000 planner and moulder
Enough cows to ensure there is no spare time.

Offline Doug Wis

  • Full Member
  • **
  • Posts: 85
  • Age: 72
  • Location: edge of the northern wis wilderness
  • Gender: Male
    • Share Post
Re: Woodmizer LT35 vs Timber King 1600
« Reply #9 on: October 09, 2018, 10:30:51 PM »
   I chose the 1600 over wm  basicly  because of all hyd controls , nothing electrical. Mine sits outside, and  that's tough on elect stuff. Had to add a remote throttle to make it more usable. Don't know if that is a factory option now. If not it should be. Previous to that a neighbor sawed thousands of feet for me with an lt30 I believe. very accurate sawing job.  I agree with  the   post that said the other companies spend too much time running down WM design. Either will do a good job for you
A man who says he can do everything at 65 that he did at 25 sure wasn't doing much at 25.

Offline ladylake

  • Senior Member x2
  • *****
  • Posts: 4840
  • Age: 66
  • Location: grey eagle mn
  • Gender: Male
  • I need to edit my profile!
    • Share Post
Re: Woodmizer LT35 vs Timber King 1600
« Reply #10 on: October 10, 2018, 04:21:59 AM »
 
 There has been a lot of misinformation put out about 4 post mills also, I don't know where that came from.  Steve
Timberking B20 12000 hours +  Case75xt grapple + forks+8" snow bucket + dirt bucket   770 Oliver   Lots(too many) of chainsaws, Like the Echo saws and the Stihl and Husky     W5  Case loader   1  trailers  Wright sharpener     Dino setter Volvo MCT125c skid loader

Offline ladylake

  • Senior Member x2
  • *****
  • Posts: 4840
  • Age: 66
  • Location: grey eagle mn
  • Gender: Male
  • I need to edit my profile!
    • Share Post
Re: Woodmizer LT35 vs Timber King 1600
« Reply #11 on: October 10, 2018, 05:51:48 AM »
 
 Looks to me the TK 1600 can handle a way bigger log plus its not a walk along.  These new TK mills have 16" above the blade clearance which takes away the cantilevered big log advantage.  Just turn that hump or knot up with that nice chain turner.  As mentioned more hydraulics and less electric is not going to break down near as much.  My B20 has over 14000 hours and I've spent less than $200 on the hyd head drive. Steve 
Timberking B20 12000 hours +  Case75xt grapple + forks+8" snow bucket + dirt bucket   770 Oliver   Lots(too many) of chainsaws, Like the Echo saws and the Stihl and Husky     W5  Case loader   1  trailers  Wright sharpener     Dino setter Volvo MCT125c skid loader

Offline Poplarpete

  • member
  • *
  • Posts: 2
  • Age: 59
  • Location: North Carolina
  • Gender: Male
  • I'm new!
    • Share Post
Re: Woodmizer LT35 vs Timber King 1600
« Reply #12 on: October 10, 2018, 06:58:44 AM »
Thanks for all the response. I found similar posts with replies but they were all old and wanted current info. Sounds as if I couldn't go wrong either way... I live in the piedmont section of NC if there's a Timberking owner near who'd be willing to let me come by and see the mill in action... Thanks again. Great website!

Offline John S

  • Senior Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 373
  • Age: 72
  • Location: Sussex County, NJ
  • Gender: Male
    • Share Post
Re: Woodmizer LT35 vs Timber King 1600
« Reply #13 on: October 10, 2018, 07:51:04 AM »
Check out "Out of the Woods" on YouTube.  LT35 without a debarker!
2018 LT40HDG38 Wide

Offline alan gage

  • Full Member x2
  • ***
  • Posts: 153
  • Age: 40
  • Location: NW Iowa
    • Share Post
Re: Woodmizer LT35 vs Timber King 1600
« Reply #14 on: October 10, 2018, 11:09:05 AM »
I bought a used and neglected Timberking B16 last year. I enjoyed resurrecting it and it was great to buy parts off the shelf from the local hardware store or surplus center. If I ever bought a new mill that would be a strong selling point for me to go with Timberking.

On the other hand there have been times with a big log were I would have liked the cantilevered head to keep me from having to trim with a chainsaw so the 4 post carriage would fit.

I really like the chain turner of the Timberking but others get by fine with Woodmizer's claw.

I like not having to walk along with the carriage, especially when the wind is blowing the sawdust the wrong direction.

I wish I had hydraulic log stops. When nearly everything else is hydraulic it really seems like a slow down to have to manually adjust them, especially when squaring up a log since you need to raise them before you turn and then lower them to cut.

My carriage is manual up/down as well but I assume the newer 1600 is powered.

I wish I had woodmizer's two plane clamp. My Timberking is an early one and they probably improved the clamp over the years but that two plane clamp sure looks handy.

Good news is that you probably can't go too far wrong either way you decide.

Alan
Timberking B-16

Offline SawyerTed

  • Senior Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 546
  • Age: 56
  • Location: Germanton, NC
  • Gender: Male
  • Summey Lumber Services, LLC
    • Share Post
Re: Woodmizer LT35 vs Timber King 1600
« Reply #15 on: October 10, 2018, 12:32:51 PM »
Pete, you'd be welcome to come see my LT35 in operation sometime. It appears we aren't too far apart.

I shopped several brands before purchasing.  The bounce issue was one thing that was pushed by some manufacturers, but has turned out to be of no consequence.

Nearly every sales rep compared their mills to Wood-mizer.  After hearing the comparisons over and over, I went to Albemarle to see the Wood-mizers.  I put a deposit on my mill during that visit.  I don't know anything about support from Timber King but I do know support from Wood-mizer is excellent.  Parts often arrive the next day and ordering is quick and easy by phone or on the website.

Periodically I saw at a site where the customer has a Timber King.  I've looked it over very closely.  I have two observations.  One TK has a different design philosophy from Wood-mizer.  Two is the one feature the TK has I wish the Wood-mizer has is the chain turner.
Woodmizer LT35HD25, Kubota MX5100, IH McCormick Farmall 140, Granberg Alaskan Chainsaw Mill, Husqvarna 372XP, Husqvarna 455 Rancher

Offline Haleiwa

  • member
  • *
  • Posts: 27
  • Clinton county, New York
    • Share Post
Re: Woodmizer LT35 vs Timber King 1600
« Reply #16 on: October 10, 2018, 01:05:50 PM »
I have a 35 and run it hard, it is a critical component of my primary income.  There is zero issue with the single mast and no bounce at all when cutting.  In addition to lumber and beams I produce flooring, shiplap, v-match, and other finished profiles, inconsistent lumber would be a serious problem for me.  I think TK is a great company as I have some of their sister company equipment that is used in down stream processing, great customer service and great products.

Yesterday I had to profile a shipment of shiplap, and the customer wanted a skip plane finish - it was a royal pain to make it come out right because my rough sawn material was so consistent that trying to get the perfect skip look was all but impossible.  

Ironically, I am right now in the process of buying a second mill and this one will be orange due to the benefits of the cantilever design and WM's powerful, yet simple to operate advanced set works.  Woodmizer does have an unfair advantage with the cantilever design, but they came up with it and made it work, Ad Victorem Spolias.
I've heard of running a band with one tooth deliberately set too wide to produce a rougher surface.
Socialism is people pretending to work while the government pretends to pay them.  Mike Huckabee

Offline WV Sawmiller

  • Senior Member x2
  • *****
  • Posts: 4980
  • Age: 65
  • Location: Hinton WV
  • Gender: Male
    • Share Post
    • Green's Sawmill Services
Re: Woodmizer LT35 vs Timber King 1600
« Reply #17 on: October 10, 2018, 02:14:06 PM »
   I was like Sawyerted. I had never watched a mill in operation but had written the major mill makers a few years before then lost interest. They were not pushy but WM was persistent sending me post card invites anytime there was a show near by. My situation changed and I got interested in a mill again so I diverted over to Albermarle and talked to Tyler on a trip to Charlotte to see my daughter. He showed me the features and put my mind at ease as to ease of operation and maintenance. I put down my deposit that day too and scheduled delivery for early January. I went ahead and got my business license, insurance, found the FF and read everything in this category between then and January. Tyler delivered my mill and did a demo for me and my son. It was 0 degrees when he left and had warmed up to 5 degrees and 6" of snow by the time he got here with my mill. The lube tank was a solid block of ice. 

   I sawed in practice a while till I was comfortable to saw for the public. My practice lumber went into building a big pole barn to store my lumber. My experience with WM for operator questions and a couple of warranty parts was first rate. When I bought belts and other parts from WM I found their prices were very competitive and delivery was always very prompt. I have since used there semi annual service loop and found the reps to be wonderful people and very professional in their servicing. It is worth the fee just to watch and learn.

   One of the other sponsors here (I will not names) then started sending me e-mails and flyers pushing me to buy their mill until I finally told them to cease and desist and finally got them turned off.

    The only time I saw a TK in operation was on a job where the sawyer set up then delayed so long the customer. my feed supplier, asked me to come too as he needed his lumber by a set date when he had help to build. I milled a couple days then on the last day the TK operator was back. The customers helper fed both of us logs. The TK lumber looked good. There was one big 17 hemlock log there and the TK sawyer told the driver to send that one to me as my hydraulics could lift it better than his. My hydraulics had no problem handling it. I don't know if his was working normally or not.
Howard Green
WM LT35HDG25(2015) , 2009 4wd Dodge PU, Kawasaki 650 ATV, Sthil 440 & 441, homemade logging arch (w/custom built rear log dolly), JD 750 w/4' wide Bushhog brand FEL

Dad always said "You can shear a sheep a bunch of times but you can only skin him once"

Offline reswire

  • Senior Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 437
  • Age: 59
  • Location: Currently under a pile of sawdust...
  • Gender: Male
    • Share Post
Re: Woodmizer LT35 vs Timber King 1600
« Reply #18 on: October 10, 2018, 10:20:16 PM »
I currently own a Woodmizer LT40, used to own a TK 1600.  To me, It's all about the bed design and the rock solid hydraulics on the Woodmizer bed.  The Woodmizer backstops are incredible.  TK 1600 backstops not so much.  I had to weld manual backstops on my 1600, when the factory stops continued to bend and flop.  I did like the chain turner, but when turning cants or moving logs around, the hydraulic toe boards and the solid bi-directional clamp make all the difference. Chain turners will leave cuts and scars on the finished board, but a bi-directional clamp will easily move cants without scarring.  Both companies are great to work with, TK sent me replacement items for free, long after the sale, and I was the second owner!  Not so much with Woodmizer.  You will pay for replacement parts and shipping there.  It is worth seeing in person, if you want to make an informed choice.  Having a sawmill dealer in your home state, is worth a lot as well.  Both great mills, I'd see both in person and then make a choice!
LT 40HDG 35, JD 5205, some Stihl saws, 15 goats, 10 chickens, 3 Chessies and a Weiner dog...

Offline ladylake

  • Senior Member x2
  • *****
  • Posts: 4840
  • Age: 66
  • Location: grey eagle mn
  • Gender: Male
  • I need to edit my profile!
    • Share Post
Re: Woodmizer LT35 vs Timber King 1600
« Reply #19 on: October 11, 2018, 06:26:44 AM »
 


 If you want some real backstops get a TK2000.   Steve
Timberking B20 12000 hours +  Case75xt grapple + forks+8" snow bucket + dirt bucket   770 Oliver   Lots(too many) of chainsaws, Like the Echo saws and the Stihl and Husky     W5  Case loader   1  trailers  Wright sharpener     Dino setter Volvo MCT125c skid loader

Offline YellowHammer

  • Senior Member x2
  • *****
  • Posts: 3323
  • Age: 53
  • Location: New Market, Alabama
  • Gender: Male
  • Always taking steps to save steps
    • Share Post
    • Hobby Hardwood Alabama
Re: Woodmizer LT35 vs Timber King 1600
« Reply #20 on: October 11, 2018, 09:15:46 AM »
I've owned a couple Woodmizers, their service is what can be expected to operate our business.  I call them, they know what I need if break something, its shipped next day, I'm back up and running.  You will break stuff.  You will have questions, and having a person on the other end of the phone who knows things is important.  I have talked to TK about edgers and I give them credit as they are honest and always answered the phone, also.  

Woodmizer has a Resharp program, thats huge, buy bands, use them, box them up and mail them.  They come back in a week or so, sharpened and ready to go.  I don't know it TK has a sharpening program.  For a new sawyer, having a convenient and high quality sharpening program would be critical.  One less thing to worry about.  About $10 a band including shipping costs.  I know there are local aftermarket sharpening companies, but I have seen more than one mill that was having sawing issues tracked back down to incorrectly sharpened bands by "local" sharpening companies.  If TK has a sharpening program, then this is not an issue.

As far as the mills themselves:

WM has hydraulic backstops.  This is important as I use my backstops for many things, including reverse rolling logs and cants, shifting logs and cants forward and backward, etc.  These movements take force, more so than could be done with manual backstop system as on the TK1600.  Backstops can be used for much more than backstops.

The first thing I noticed was the guy on the TK video having to walk around and manually set a height pin in the log clamp.  That put me off immediately, thats just one more trip around the mill, twice for every log, for the life of the mill.  The WM has a hydraulic two plane where the height of the clamp is set from the control station.

As said, chains turners and claw turners will scar up high dollar cants.  The WM two plane will not damage cants.  Once I have a cant, I only use the two plane because its fast and won't cause divots.

The WM has hydraulic toe boards, a necessity for grade sawing.  I use my hydraulic toe boards almost every log, whereas on my old manual mill I almost never used them.  Why?  Because manual toe boards are a pain and inconvenient.  So with hydraulic toe boards, I can cut parallel to the bark, easier, which results in higher quality wood, easier.  I didn't see that the TK had hydraulic toe boards.

TK has engine driven hydraulics.  That is nice and reliable.  The WM has an electric pump.  Both work, just different systems.  I would prefer if WM had an engine driven pump.

Forget about the cantilever head being an issue.  Its not.  We sell dried, grade hardwood, about 20 different species that are skip planed to 15/16".  We mill to 1-1/8", dry and shrink to about 1-1/16" and then skip plane to 15/16" only taking a 1/16", give or take, off each face.  Most boards will clean up 100% on one face 90% on the other.  Only a very accurate mill can do that.  In contrast, when we occasionally buy wood from mega mills, using circular saws, we have much worse results with the skip planing, with many more blade marks still on the board, and less clean faces.  So a cantilever head will cut more accurately than the wood coming off industrial grade mega mills.  I have no doubt the TK cuts very accurately, also.  Dull, or poorly set and sharpened bands as well as not reading log stress will cause the majority of inaccuracies, day in and day out, and that is why a quality resharpening program is so important.  

Model for Model, for me, the LT35 wins over the 1600 due to more hydraulic features, i.e. hydraulic toeboards, hydraulic backstops, hydraulic two plane clamp, if I was going to choose.




HobbyHardwoodAlabama.com

Offline ladylake

  • Senior Member x2
  • *****
  • Posts: 4840
  • Age: 66
  • Location: grey eagle mn
  • Gender: Male
  • I need to edit my profile!
    • Share Post
Re: Woodmizer LT35 vs Timber King 1600
« Reply #21 on: October 11, 2018, 11:54:03 AM »

 Some of the TK advantages
 
 Way more capacity, not even close
 Stationary command post, you are certainly walking way more with a WM than you ever will with the TK

Twin rail, easy to keep adjusted and not necessary to spray down with atf to keep working (Seems like WM is switching over to twin rail on their new mills)
 Engine driven hyd, real reliable compared to troublesome WM electric driven pumps
 Hyd feed, WAY less trouble than the WM electric system
 If you do any amount of sawing get a sharpener and setter, WAY less cost than sending them in.  I think TK does sharpening, but to me I can sharpen blades just about as fast as boxing them up and sending them in.
 I understand TK swing up stops on the 1600 are not the strongest but I'd have them breakproof in a couple of days.
 Almost all of the parts are off the shelf
 Most likely forgot a couple.    Steve
Timberking B20 12000 hours +  Case75xt grapple + forks+8" snow bucket + dirt bucket   770 Oliver   Lots(too many) of chainsaws, Like the Echo saws and the Stihl and Husky     W5  Case loader   1  trailers  Wright sharpener     Dino setter Volvo MCT125c skid loader

Offline Hilltop366

  • Senior Member x2
  • *****
  • Posts: 2202
  • Location: Nova Scotia
  • Gender: Male
    • Share Post
Re: Woodmizer LT35 vs Timber King 1600
« Reply #22 on: October 11, 2018, 01:14:14 PM »
Question, does one need to be a Woodmizer owner to use their re-sharp service?

Offline WV Sawmiller

  • Senior Member x2
  • *****
  • Posts: 4980
  • Age: 65
  • Location: Hinton WV
  • Gender: Male
    • Share Post
    • Green's Sawmill Services
Re: Woodmizer LT35 vs Timber King 1600
« Reply #23 on: October 11, 2018, 01:58:13 PM »
   Call and ask. You will know immediately.
Howard Green
WM LT35HDG25(2015) , 2009 4wd Dodge PU, Kawasaki 650 ATV, Sthil 440 & 441, homemade logging arch (w/custom built rear log dolly), JD 750 w/4' wide Bushhog brand FEL

Dad always said "You can shear a sheep a bunch of times but you can only skin him once"

Offline Tom the Sawyer

  • Senior Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 846
  • Age: 67
  • Location: Eudora, KS
  • Gender: Male
  • Converting your logs to lumber at my home or yours
    • Share Post
    • Tom the Sawyer Portable Sawmill Service
Re: Woodmizer LT35 vs Timber King 1600
« Reply #24 on: October 11, 2018, 02:15:40 PM »
Timberking does have a resharpening service.  Used it many years before buying my sharpener and setter.  For someone starting out, use a sharpening service, you'll have a steep enough learning curve without adding blade complexities into the mix.  As mentioned earlier, the hydraulic items mentioned as missing on the 1600 are available on the next model up and may be available on the 1600 as options.
07 Timberking B-20, Custom-made log arch, 20' trailer w/ log loading arch, F350 SD flatbed dump.  Princeton piggy-back forklift.  Bobcat S250, Stihl 025C 16" and a Husqvarna 372XP 24/30" bars, Grizzly 20" planer, Nyle L200M DH kiln.
If you call and my wife says "He's sawin logs", I ain't snorin'.

Offline PAmizerman

  • Senior Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 309
  • Age: 26
  • Location: Loretto PA
  • Gender: Male
  • Just Another Day In Paradise!!
    • Share Post
Re: Woodmizer LT35 vs Timber King 1600
« Reply #25 on: October 11, 2018, 08:45:09 PM »
@ladylake  

Have you ever run a woodmizer?
Just curious if you have any experience to back up you're complaints/ theiries?

I've never run a timberking but my woodmizer does everything I ask it to 
And is a joy to run 

As for off the shelf parts. I'd rather call up the manufacturer and get what is supposed to be on the mill.
When I need a part I call WM and get the part next day. And I know it is right. No guessing if it will work and lots of time saved not researching parts. WM prices on parts are more than fair. Time is money. Down time is even more money.
No matter what mill you get things will break and need repaired.
Woodmizer lt40 super remote 42hp Kubota diesel. Accuset II
Traverse 6035 telehandler and a lot of back breaking work!!

Offline terrifictimbersllc

  • Senior Member x2
  • *****
  • Posts: 4101
  • Age: 64
  • Location: Mystic, CT
  • Gender: Male
    • Share Post
    • Terrific Timbers LLC
Re: Woodmizer LT35 vs Timber King 1600
« Reply #26 on: October 11, 2018, 09:11:08 PM »
You don’t have to be a Woodmizer mill owner to use their resharp service. But they only sharpen Woodmizer blades, so you pretty much need to be a Woodmizer blade owner.
DJ Hoover, Terrific Timbers LLC,  Mystic CT   2001 WM LT40SHDD (42HP Kubota, Accuset2, FAO's, Lubemizer, debarker, hydraulics everywhere), Peterson WPF 10-30 with chain slabber. Logrite fetching arch, WM BMS250 sharpener/BMT250 setter.

Offline WV Sawmiller

  • Senior Member x2
  • *****
  • Posts: 4980
  • Age: 65
  • Location: Hinton WV
  • Gender: Male
    • Share Post
    • Green's Sawmill Services
Re: Woodmizer LT35 vs Timber King 1600
« Reply #27 on: October 11, 2018, 09:17:00 PM »
   TT may well be spot on but I'd double check with your local WM dealer. I thought I read somewhere that some dealers might do other brands too. I think the re-sharpening is almost a separate business with different offices doing some things that other WM shops do not. 
Howard Green
WM LT35HDG25(2015) , 2009 4wd Dodge PU, Kawasaki 650 ATV, Sthil 440 & 441, homemade logging arch (w/custom built rear log dolly), JD 750 w/4' wide Bushhog brand FEL

Dad always said "You can shear a sheep a bunch of times but you can only skin him once"

Offline DPatton

  • Senior Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 468
  • Age: 53
  • Location: SE, Nebraska
  • Gender: Male
    • Share Post
Re: Woodmizer LT35 vs Timber King 1600
« Reply #28 on: October 11, 2018, 09:21:52 PM »
I run a variety of blade manufacturers on my TK1600 including WM blades.
TimberKing 1600, 30' gooseneck trailer, Chevy HD2500, Echo Chainsaw, 60" Logrite.

Work isn't so bad when you enjoy what your doing.

Offline farmfromkansas

  • Full Member
  • **
  • Posts: 50
  • Age: 67
  • I'm new!
    • Share Post
Re: Woodmizer LT35 vs Timber King 1600
« Reply #29 on: October 11, 2018, 10:23:22 PM »
First guy I took logs to, had a wm 30.  He just ran his mill and let maintenance and adjusting go.  Still made decent boards, except he cut my boards on his inch scale, instead of the 4/4 scale.

Offline ladylake

  • Senior Member x2
  • *****
  • Posts: 4840
  • Age: 66
  • Location: grey eagle mn
  • Gender: Male
  • I need to edit my profile!
    • Share Post
Re: Woodmizer LT35 vs Timber King 1600
« Reply #30 on: October 12, 2018, 04:51:59 AM »
@ladylake  

Have you ever run a woodmizer?
Just curious if you have any experience to back up you're complaints/ theiries?

I've never run a timberking but my woodmizer does everything I ask it to
And is a joy to run

As for off the shelf parts. I'd rather call up the manufacturer and get what is supposed to be on the mill.
When I need a part I call WM and get the part next day. And I know it is right. No guessing if it will work and lots of time saved not researching parts. WM prices on parts are more than fair. Time is money. Down time is even more money.
No matter what mill you get things will break and need repaired.
Your right downtime is money and my mill has never been down more than 3 hours in 14000 hour, maybe that why I like it.  I have never run a WM but have had a couple saw for  me before I got mine.   When I can get the exact replacement part online like Goodyear  3 grove drive belt for $11,  up-down solenoid same brand same part number for $7.95 vs  $50 . I keep some spares on hand which results in very little down time.  My mill doesn't eat solenoid either, 2 so far in 14000 hours.  About the only thing I have to buy from TK is the computer and sensor .  Steve

 I'm just listing the advantages of a TK mill , same as you WM owners do. Should be fair either way
Timberking B20 12000 hours +  Case75xt grapple + forks+8" snow bucket + dirt bucket   770 Oliver   Lots(too many) of chainsaws, Like the Echo saws and the Stihl and Husky     W5  Case loader   1  trailers  Wright sharpener     Dino setter Volvo MCT125c skid loader

Offline alan gage

  • Full Member x2
  • ***
  • Posts: 153
  • Age: 40
  • Location: NW Iowa
    • Share Post
Re: Woodmizer LT35 vs Timber King 1600
« Reply #31 on: October 12, 2018, 09:50:10 AM »
As for off the shelf parts. I'd rather call up the manufacturer and get what is supposed to be on the mill. When I need a part I call WM and get the part next day. And I know it is right. No guessing if it will work and lots of time saved not researching parts. WM prices on parts are more than fair. Time is money. Down time is even more money.
 

Not picking sides but just wanted to point out that TK is more than happy to sell you the parts that go on your mill and are quick to ship them out. When I was rebuilding my mill I called them up and ordered quite a few parts. They were all here next day. They were very helpful figuring out what I needed and have been friendly every time I called. As I learned more about working on the machine I realized many of the parts I could get at our very good local hardware store one block down the street or I could order them from Surplus Center. It was more work to figure out what I needed but it saved me money and helped me learn some things. At the time I was fixing up the mill over the winter so down-time wasn't important.

Alan
Timberking B-16

Offline DPatton

  • Senior Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 468
  • Age: 53
  • Location: SE, Nebraska
  • Gender: Male
    • Share Post
Re: Woodmizer LT35 vs Timber King 1600
« Reply #32 on: October 12, 2018, 03:27:38 PM »
As for off the shelf parts. I'd rather call up the manufacturer and get what is supposed to be on the mill. When I need a part I call WM and get the part next day. And I know it is right. No guessing if it will work and lots of time saved not researching parts. WM prices on parts are more than fair. Time is money. Down time is even more money.


Not picking sides but just wanted to point out that TK is more than happy to sell you the parts that go on your mill and are quick to ship them out. When I was rebuilding my mill I called them up and ordered quite a few parts. They were all here next day. They were very helpful figuring out what I needed and have been friendly every time I called. As I learned more about working on the machine I realized many of the parts I could get at our very good local hardware store one block down the street or I could order them from Surplus Center. It was more work to figure out what I needed but it saved me money and helped me learn some things. At the time I was fixing up the mill over the winter so down-time wasn't important.

Alan
Your right Alan, when my mill was new if I had a problem TK always replaced parts under warrant shipped next day at no cost and no questions asked. TK's service technician's have been amazing at answering questions and troubleshooting for me as well. Now that my mill is past its warranty period the TK reps and service techs are still as helpful as ever and they still ship me parts and or blades next day on my door step. You just cant beat that kind of service. 
TimberKing 1600, 30' gooseneck trailer, Chevy HD2500, Echo Chainsaw, 60" Logrite.

Work isn't so bad when you enjoy what your doing.

Offline dean herring

  • Senior Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 561
  • Age: 58
  • Location: dubach la.
  • Gender: Male
  • I'm new!
    • Share Post
Re: Woodmizer LT35 vs Timber King 1600
« Reply #33 on: October 12, 2018, 05:24:43 PM »
I know it possible to add up/down backstops, two plane clamp and toe boards to a TK 1600 jus what would it cost
That the only con I have with mine.
Can I get the hardware and install myself?
Failure is not an option  3D Lumber


Share via delicious Share via digg Share via facebook Share via linkedin Share via pinterest Share via reddit Share via stumble Share via tumblr Share via twitter

xx
alternative to retrofitting set-works on Timber King 1600

Started by TractorBoy78 on Sawmills and Milling

6 Replies
1285 Views
Last post November 06, 2014, 11:51:18 PM
by fstedy
xx
Woodmizer or Timber King

Started by TNhobbyfarmer on Sawmills and Milling

10 Replies
3600 Views
Last post March 30, 2007, 07:36:44 PM
by LeeB
xx
Wood-mizer LT35 v/s timberking 1600

Started by red pine on Sawmills and Milling

41 Replies
18745 Views
Last post March 22, 2011, 09:17:19 AM
by red pine
xx
Quick woodmizer lt35 help

Started by mrector on Sawmills and Milling

11 Replies
1968 Views
Last post August 06, 2014, 05:55:06 PM
by MartyParsons
 


Powered by EzPortal