The Forestry Forum

General Forestry => Forestry and Logging => Topic started by: Madman_Mark on September 26, 2004, 02:47:12 PM

Title: Recomendations on a small, low impact forwarder ?
Post by: Madman_Mark on September 26, 2004, 02:47:12 PM
Right now I use a tractor and winch to do some part time logging but am thinking about taking it a step furter and maybe sometime getting a small forwarder (and keeping the tractor/winch). Any recomendations ?
Title: Re: Recomendations on a small, low impact forwarde
Post by: Scott on September 26, 2004, 06:28:31 PM
A used TJ 215 forwarder would be a nice little machine. At one time dad was thinking about getting a Bombardier tractor with a track trailer.

Long Url (http://www.autoseller.ca/trader/result/affich.asp?rubno=4800&r=%27ATL%27%2C%27NSC%27%2C%27NBR%27%2C%27PEI%27%2C%27NFL%27&ste=&sid=&issr=1&yfr=0&yto=0&kfr=0&kto=0&pfr=0&pto=0&dm=1&dp=8&mk=&md=&kw=&or=0&oby=7&pg=18&vid=1875322)
Title: Re: Recomendations on a small, low impact forwarde
Post by: Woodhog on September 26, 2004, 08:21:19 PM
Maybe you could put a bogie wheel forestry trailer with
a loader on your present tractor, if it is 4WD....and has the
pump capacity flow rate to run the loader...

That would be a cheaper way to haul the wood out and still
have only one power unit to spend the dough  on....

Patu etc..

http://www.logloader.com/features1.html

Loads of them up around Windsor at Nova or Lawrence Harts..

The other make is Nooka I think....never can spell that right

Title: Re: Recomendations on a small, low impact forwarde
Post by: woodmills1 on September 27, 2004, 02:31:55 PM
wow something is too wide on this post.  Check out www.payeur.com     I have one of there forester packages and it is da bomb for me.
Title: Re: Recomendations on a small, low impact forwarde
Post by: theonlybull on September 28, 2004, 06:26:12 AM
theres a guy down this way, (lower valley NS)  that's using a mini skidder that's made in Que,  it's a nice little machine, all hydro drive and controls,  and 2 winches....  he's had very few problems.  his company name is CTL Forrestry ( i think)

he seems very happy with it.  i'll try and find some info on it

Title: Re: Recomendations on a small, low impact forwarde
Post by: Murf on September 29, 2004, 12:04:13 PM
We use really low impact skidders in our bush lot at the farm, they have 4 hooves..... but the exhaust  :o is another matter.
Title: Re: Recomendations on a small, low impact forwarde
Post by: Kevin on September 30, 2004, 05:14:28 AM
Quotea mini skidder that's made in Que,

That might be the Berfor 2000.
I want one but not at 29k.  :-/

http://www.radinter.com/radtech/anglais/berfor/1berfor.html
Title: Re: Recomendations on a small, low impact forwarde
Post by: Ron Scott on September 30, 2004, 06:00:52 AM
Production, types of timber, and landscapes that you will be working in, as well as a nearby servicing dealer should be some of the considerations.

Check for what is recommended by local loggers and dealers in your service area. There are some low impact specialty machines being made for "hobby type' logging but any of the small rubber tired forwarders such as Timberjack, Valmet, Iron Mule, John Deere, Franklin, Ponsee, etc.would serve you well for reliability if purchased new or in good used condition.

Some small units such as the Iron Mule are shown in the Timber Equipment and Harvesting Thread.
Title: Re: Recomendations on a small, low impact forwarde
Post by: Woodhog on September 30, 2004, 06:04:10 AM
It was maybe one of these yellow skidders by Turboforest
of Quebec....Model TF-42C

http://www.vannattabros.com/skidder6.html

There was a good article in "Atlantic Forestry" about a chap
in a  Park in Maine who was using one of these small skidders in the park.

I dont know if they still make them or how many may have been sold.

They have a 9500 pound winch, 14 feet long, 6 feet wide,
24 inch wheels, and a 50 HP Perkins 4 Cyl...
Title: Re: Recomendations on a small, low impact forwarde
Post by: theonlybull on September 30, 2004, 08:31:52 AM
woodhog,  that's the machine.  it's a nicely built little machine, and he seems very happy with it.  the dual winches are nice, but they have a weakness in the brake bands.  i've had to fix them a few times, but haven't seen them on the machine to know if they could be made a little heavier.
Title: Re: Recomendations on a small, low impact forwarde
Post by: ScottAR on October 01, 2004, 12:10:59 AM
Anyone have a web address for these guys?  Every link I've tried is either nothing at all or it's porn...  
Title: Re: Recomendations on a small, low impact forwarde
Post by: slowzuki on October 01, 2004, 05:59:33 AM
Didn't the article on the guy in Maine say the company went out of buisines?
Title: Re: Recomendations on a small, low impact forwarde
Post by: SwampDonkey on October 01, 2004, 05:32:18 PM
It also depends if your making a livelihood or just puttin away on a  small woodlot. Buying a forwarder big or small costs $$, and the average 100 acre woodlot doesn't justify the expense. I saw a small forwarder from Quebec 4 years ago at our local woodlot demo and it was $80,000. Well, I wouldn't get that much $$ if I clearcut a 50 acre woodlot, when all expenses are paid. Since, I'm against clearcuts for the most part, I guess I won't have a forwarder. ;)
Title: Re: Recomendations on a small, low impact forwarde
Post by: Murf on October 04, 2004, 09:09:45 AM
One of the most popular choices for a small 'forwarder' around here used to be a small tractor, like an 8N Ford, with an extra axle just ahead of the rear tires and half-tracks around them. If the snow was deep the front tires were replaced with skis.

Most of these units were home-brewed, built in the barn creations. They worked VERY well, were very low impact as long as there was even just a little snow on the ground, and soince most farms had a small tractor anyways the only cost was a few scrounged bits & pieces and some time & effort.

A few hours north of here were I have a cottage they are still a common sight in small family run firewood or Maple Syrup operations.
Title: Re: Recomendations on a small, low impact forwarde
Post by: Dom on October 04, 2004, 02:43:55 PM
The first Rottne's were modified Ford tractors. They came without the front axle, and they would basically install a midjoint with a trailer in the back. The PTO was used to power up the rear axle. They would also change the clutch to a hydrostatic unit. Interestingly enough, the machine weight 9000kg and would pull 10000kg of wood. Most  machines nowadays weight more then what they are capable of carrying.

Sorry for babbling on, I have pics from a Forestry Show that I'm currently modifying to fit on the site (yes I'm slow  ;D)  that include a small forwarder. I found it to be interesting and a fast little worker. I'll try to read what model it is, because I forgot the name.  ::)
Title: Re: Recomendations on a small, low impact forwarde
Post by: Dom on October 05, 2004, 06:48:19 PM
The small forwarder is a Vmek.
Here is a picture:
(https://forestryforum.com/images/03_21_04/mini-forwarder.jpg)
Title: Re: Recomendations on a small, low impact forwarde
Post by: Buzz-sawyer on October 05, 2004, 07:45:20 PM
(https://forestryforum.com/images/03_21_04/OLD%20TRACK%20FORD2.jpg)
Hey, this what your talkin bout Murf? :)
Title: Re: Recomendations on a small, low impact forwarde
Post by: SwampDonkey on October 06, 2004, 03:00:59 AM
Dom,

That's the forwarder that I spoke of at our show. And $80,000 later  ???
Title: Re: Recomendations on a small, low impact forwarde
Post by: theonlybull on October 06, 2004, 03:32:55 PM
i was talking to the guy with the mini skidder today, and he said that the company has closed out, but there is talk of another company building the design....

he also said he'd buy another one in a heartbeat.
Title: Re: Recomendations on a small, low impact forwarde
Post by: Dom on October 06, 2004, 05:58:12 PM
SwampDonkey,

I hadn't realized that it was 80000$. That places it in a odd market in my opinion. Its too expensive for a small forester, and the machine is too small for a contractor.  ??? It did work well from what I saw though.
Title: Re: Recomendations on a small, low impact forwarde
Post by: SwampDonkey on October 07, 2004, 04:33:49 AM
Dom:

Its not very productive, but would be ideal in young stands for semi-commercial or a commercial thinning in smaller wood. But, its way too expensive. For some of these older PCT thinnings it would be dandy, if your on crown lands. Not enough landowners would be willing to have you commercial thin their woods. They think one thinning (PCT) is enough, then they plan on clear cutting it again.   ::) And with fir and poplar being a large component of the private thinnings I can't say I blame them, they are short lived species and fast growing.

cheers
Title: Re: Recomendations on a small, low impact forwarde
Post by: Murf on October 07, 2004, 12:16:10 PM
Buzz, that's just about smack on.

Those little things will go ANYWHERE.

Title: Re: Recomendations on a small, low impact forwarde
Post by: Dirigoboy on October 12, 2004, 08:37:23 PM
I've really enjoyed this discussion.  As a new guy here, I'm interested in these websites that demonstrate small logging equipment.  If anyone has additional resources they'd care to post, I'm definitely up for looking at some more of them.
Alan
Title: Re: Recomendations on a small, low impact forwarde
Post by: Murf on October 13, 2004, 08:35:38 AM
Hmmmm, that picture of the Vmek gives me an idea... :P

There are plenty of old 2wd tractors around here, nobody wants them anymore. If I removed the front axle completely and mounted a pivoting joint to the back of the axle and the loader mounts then made a tandem walking axle frame out the back, viola!!! A small low-impact forwarder. I think though that for economy I would use a pto winch through a block on an overhead arch to load & unload.

Thoughts, ideas, critisism, or just plain laughter, let's hear it.
Title: Re: Recomendations on a small, low impact forwarde
Post by: Buzz-sawyer on October 13, 2004, 09:06:54 AM
(https://forestryforum.com/images/03_21_04/skidder.gif)
Hmmm I got LOTS of IDEAS!! 8) 8)
Title: Re: Recomendations on a small, low impact forwarde
Post by: Murf on October 13, 2004, 09:34:17 AM
Buzz, I think that unit in your picture would look waaaayyy better with a good used Prentice on the back .... :D :D :D
Title: Re: Recomendations on a small, low impact forwarde
Post by: Buzz-sawyer on October 13, 2004, 10:20:24 AM
O.K
Heres the plan........use 2 two ton truck rear ends and frames cut down so they can hook to a pivot point in the middle, as an articulated vehicle, gather 4 large combine tires and cut the centers out of you steel 2 ton truck rims,  weld them into the combine rims,then instal 2 hydraulic motors to drive the seperate rear ends , insta a winch with hydraulic motor and there it is an unstoppable small skidder-super farm tractor ;) :)
Title: Re: Recomendations on a small, low impact forwarde
Post by: Murf on October 13, 2004, 10:59:37 AM
Why go to all that trouble?

Mount a log loader with padded grapple on a hay wagon and power it with a small gas engine.

When you want to travel you just grab a tree and pull, when you get to the tree grab one farther away.  8) 8) 8) 8) 8)

Guaranteed to never spin a wheel, and the environmentalists will love it too because it's a 'tree hugger' too... :D :D :D :D :D

Ohhhhhh, I slay me sometimes, occasionally somebody else even finds it funny.
Title: Re: Recomendations on a small, low impact forwarde
Post by: theonlybull on October 14, 2004, 08:17:15 PM
buzz,  that's very similar to how our skidder is built,
2 ton rear ends, articulated in the middle, but uses an old duce and a half t-case, then a 4 speed chev, then the orginal 3 speed, from the vauxaul that the motor came from.

she's a tought little machine, and has been working for 38 years now.  it's used daily as a yard crane,  then we switch booms and head for the woods.
here's a link to a pic of it
http://machinebuilders.net/absoluteig/gallery%2FPowered%5FProjects%2Fskidder%2Ejpg
Title: Re: Recomendations on a small, low impact forwarde
Post by: Buzz-sawyer on October 14, 2004, 09:26:21 PM
(https://forestryforum.com/images/03_21_04/skid.jpg)
(https://forestryforum.com/images/03_21_04/skid1.jpg)
It reminds me of this one ;)
One question, whty cant anyone in our world produce a simple inexpensive and indestructible machine like this???
You guys did 8)
Title: Re: Recomendations on a small, low impact forwarde
Post by: redpowerd on October 14, 2004, 09:45:27 PM
my new project looks alot like this one! ;)
Title: Re: Recomendations on a small, low impact forwarde
Post by: theonlybull on October 16, 2004, 05:00:59 AM
thanks guys,  the only problem is, that it would be hard to build a machine like this for someone else.  some ppl could use this machine daily,  but most would beat it to death in no time.  by the time you had one built strong enough for forrestry duty, the price would be to high, and the buyer would be stuck with a low production machine, that spart parts would have to be custom made for, like the machine it's self.

Now, if someone walked in our shop tomorrow, and wanted one, and the price didn't scare them, there would be no reason that we couldn't build one.....
Title: Re: Recomendations on a small, low impact forwarde
Post by: Buzz-sawyer on October 16, 2004, 08:55:32 AM
I bet your price wouldnt be over $80,000 U.S
 like these other small skidders , eh? ;)
Title: Re: Recomendations on a small, low impact forwarde
Post by: theonlybull on October 16, 2004, 12:09:12 PM
i would hope not,  but honestly, if i was building it for a customer, i know that 80,000 $ wouldn't be far off.  there's alot of labour involved in building a comercial grade machine.  not to metion a drivetrain that would stand up to the abuse.
Title: Re: Recomendations on a small, low impact forwarde
Post by: Murf on October 18, 2004, 10:16:14 AM
When someone asks me for a price to build something my second question, right after "When do you need it?" is always, "Do you want a warranty on it?".

As Bull alluded to, the cost of idiot-proofing something is very high.
Title: Re: Recomendations on a small, low impact forwarde
Post by: Ed_K on October 18, 2004, 06:10:04 PM
 On the front cover of the Sawlog Bulletin theres a pic of a double drum TimberJack skidder. Bet it ain't cheap tho  :o.
Title: Re: Recomendations on a small, low impact forwarde
Post by: Dirigoboy on October 21, 2004, 05:49:56 PM
I checked out the website for that Forcat 2000.  Can anyone hazard a guess as to the price on it with the trailer & log loader?
Alan
Title: Re: Recomendations on a small, low impact forwarde
Post by: Awassos on January 22, 2006, 02:42:35 PM
Quote from: ScottAR on October 01, 2004, 12:10:59 AM
Anyone have a web address for these guys?  Every link I've tried is either nothing at all or it's porn... 


Go to http://www.awassos.com for all info you need  (this version is in french by now, but an anglish vertion will be soon available
Title: The Ultimatamosto in Low Impact Forwarding
Post by: fencerowphil (Phil L.) on January 25, 2006, 11:25:46 PM
The next time History Channel runs "Logging Tech"  take careful
note of the devices called...
       the "high winch line,"
       the "mast tree," and
       the "Donkey."
(Hey all you need is a 150 ft.+ tall tree and you can get those
logs right up there where you need 'em.)
:D   :D   :D
Phil L.
                  P.S.  Don't call me to top-out the mast tree.
                          And aren't those radio controlled choker cable release systems neato!