The Forestry Forum

General Forestry => Forestry and Logging => Topic started by: deastman on April 20, 2015, 04:42:29 PM

Title: Processor rate versus Forwarder rate
Post by: deastman on April 20, 2015, 04:42:29 PM
Let's say on a $20/ton rate to process and forward 16' to 24' pulp, what do some of you C-T-L guys figure for a percentage of that rate for the processor  versus the forwarder?  50/50, 60/40 etc
Title: Re: Processor rate versus Forwarder rate
Post by: Corley5 on April 20, 2015, 05:41:04 PM
Never thought about it but the harvester seems to be the all around more expensive of the two machines to run.  I'd think 70-30 with 70% for the processor  :-\  Maybe  ??? :)
Title: Re: Processor rate versus Forwarder rate
Post by: wannaergo on April 20, 2015, 06:18:02 PM
There is a couple guys around my area that work together but separate. They each own one machine. I think they found the numbers to be at 63/37.
Title: Re: Processor rate versus Forwarder rate
Post by: deastman on April 20, 2015, 06:40:38 PM
That's the same as I was thinking.  The processor has to do a lot more work per cord than the forwarder does and my forwarder can usually yard a little more than I can process in a day in average conditions. Thinking about adding a subcontractor with a processor to help increase production this year but then that might be too much for my forwarder to keep up with and then I would need to find a bigger forwarder. Always seems to be a vicious circle trying to balance out production with what equipment you have versus how much more you could produce if you added more or bigger equipment
Title: Re: Processor rate versus Forwarder rate
Post by: 1270d on April 20, 2015, 08:09:50 PM
I've heard forwarder work time should be around 2/3 harvester time.
Title: Re: Processor rate versus Forwarder rate
Post by: Jamie_C on April 20, 2015, 08:29:06 PM
Around here the processor rate per tonne is generally double the forwarder rate per tonne.