Had this stacked with red oak but I don't think that's right?
(https://forestryforum.com/gallery/albums/userpics/21454/1000017561.jpg)
(https://forestryforum.com/gallery/albums/userpics/21454/1000017560.jpg)
nice end grain pic. how did you do it? can you get a bark straight on pic also? I am not sure.
(https://forestryforum.com/gallery/albums/userpics/21454/1000017563.jpg)
The picture is with a magnifier app on my phone.
I think Majicman mentioned it and it does come in handy for other things as the eyes get older
I am far from being an identity person but the pictures that I am seeing say White Oak.
Am not seeing any rays for it being an oak.
Pic is a bit out of focus, but almost see wavy parenchyma that would indicate an elm.
I see lots of rays in the blurry magnified pic, around the middle where it is browner and showing tyloses. I'm with MM, white oak.
okay, I don't, but if you do, agree with white oak :wink_2:
Thanks for the help!!
I see rays, but don't seem very prominent.
(https://forestryforum.com/gallery/albums/userpics/11009/SD_White_Ash_EG.jpg) (https://forestryforum.com/gallery/displayimage.php?pid=83064)
This picture shows fine rays to, but it's white ash. Tylosis is common in white ash. Obviously it's not 100%. But, All the latewood pores are filled. Fewer are filled in the earlywood.
Tried to get a better Pic. Thoughts now??
(https://forestryforum.com/gallery/albums/userpics/21454/1000017570.jpg)
(https://forestryforum.com/gallery/albums/userpics/21454/1000017571.jpg)
Ash
White Ash
thanks guys appreciate the responses!!
RR
Agreed
The better and clearer picture in Reply #9 shows tyloses but not the unmistakable rays that White Oak would have.
Ash.
I scanned a slice of Ash from down in the shop. The picture started out I was going to show I had made tongue and groove wainscoat, but then I kept zooming in ffcheesy.
(https://forestryforum.com/gallery/albums/userpics/10017/ashop.jpg) (https://forestryforum.com/gallery/displayimage.php?pid=353634)