The Forestry Forum

General Forestry => General Board => Topic started by: rjwoelk on January 13, 2019, 06:29:42 PM

Title: Good grammar
Post by: rjwoelk on January 13, 2019, 06:29:42 PM
I keep hearing people talk about what,
Me and (name of person involved did)
I was taught to say the persons name first. This seems to come from the now generation. The ones that feel intitled perhaps.  I guess not paying attention in grammar class.
Just feeling grouchy about it. Hope this is not the start of being a grouch old man.
Title: Re: Good grammar
Post by: Southside on January 13, 2019, 07:04:46 PM
U no that ain't who dis means.  :D  #talkright
Title: Re: Good grammar
Post by: rjwoelk on January 13, 2019, 07:12:40 PM
I just had a miserable tarping job. And well its like banging your tumb stubing the toe the cows get out they go all directions the dog gets going and sends them to the neighbours field. You yell at him he refuses to to do anything after that. Well you know the feeling. ::)
Title: Re: Good grammar
Post by: Southside on January 13, 2019, 08:12:08 PM
Oh - do I ever!!  This winter to add insult to injury while chasing the cows you will get your boot stuck in the mud and run out of it, while trying to hop back to your boot and avoiding putting your sock in the mud your other foot suddenly will slip and down you will go in the mud while managing to still hold your foot in the air.  Of course you can't stand up with only one foot at which point you have to intentionally set your sock into the mud, about the time you do that the neighbor drives up and yells at you that your cows are in his front yard.... :(  Oh look - I just set my hand into a fresh patty....
Title: Re: Good grammar
Post by: DPatton on January 13, 2019, 08:45:00 PM
 :D :D :D :D :D I remember those days from when I was growing up on the farm. 
Title: Re: Good grammar
Post by: coalsmok on January 13, 2019, 08:46:06 PM
So.....it's not just me who's been having that kind of fun.
You know the kind where a roll gets away and tears down a panel of fence, then when you do get it to where your going you watch a cow tear another panel down instead of walking through the gate 30' down the fence. Yay🙄
Title: Re: Good grammar
Post by: Magicman on January 13, 2019, 08:59:36 PM
I always try to use correct grammar but there are times when I fall off of the wagon.  There are also times when I intentionally use "Colloquial Redneck English" just for the heck of it.  smiley_dizzy 

Now I was raised on a farm so I have heard all of the "words" and how to put them together when dealing with livestock.  :o 
Title: Re: Good grammar
Post by: SawyerTed on January 13, 2019, 09:28:02 PM
Sadly I've been through just about every scenario you can imagine with cows out during wet weather. Nothing like being stuck to your boot tops and an angry angus bull giving you the side eye, stamping his foot and swinging his head!
Title: Re: Good grammar
Post by: Runningalucas on January 13, 2019, 09:56:30 PM
Yup, I 'seen' that too... ::)
Title: Re: Good grammar
Post by: Southside on January 13, 2019, 11:06:17 PM
Quote from: SawyerTed on January 13, 2019, 09:28:02 PMNothing like being stuck to your boot tops and an angry angus bull giving you the side eye, stamping his foot and swinging his head


Actually now that you mention it there is.  About a decade ago I was helping a guy who owned a "mini" stallion - he was definitely a tiny guy in statue but not heart.   We were in the paddock with the little guy when Tom bent over to pick something up - did not take but a second and that stud horse attempted to do what stud horses do.... I was not able to assist with the predicament as I was laughing too hard to be of any value while Tom was screaming like a girl and doing his best to beat feet for the fence.  It was a toss up trying to decide who made more of a fuss - Tom or the stud.   
Title: Re: Good grammar
Post by: rjwoelk on January 13, 2019, 11:46:32 PM
 :D :D :D :D that would be funny.
When I was running sheep.
30 below and trying to walk let alone run. Frozen Roller bearings all over the place. Reminds me of a funny song. You cant roller skate in a buffalo herd.
Title: Re: Good grammar
Post by: rjwoelk on January 13, 2019, 11:48:37 PM
Had the ram run at me . I got a pail of water and threw it in his face the next time he tried that. Fixed his little red wagon.
Title: Re: Good grammar
Post by: YellowHammer on January 14, 2019, 08:46:45 AM
I notice on the TV shows when southern people, speaking very clearly, get closed captioning, so people can read and understand what they are saying.

But yet they won't caption the folks with the "non southern" accent, who are almost impossible for me to understand.  I tell my wife "Those folks talk funny". :D

I was in Australia several years ago, conducting a business meeting, everybody professional and quiet, everybody dressed in suits and ties, and all of a sudden, my Australian counterparts, (great folks) just started spontaneously laughing.  I asked them what happened, and they replied although they spoke English, my accent was so heavy, they couldn't understand a word of what I was saying.   :D :D  

So one of the guys, who had spent some time in Alabama, became my "official" interpreter, and we all had a good laugh, because that let me reel off some heavy Southern Speak that would even blank him out.  It was a meeting I'll never forget, and I think about it now, as an example where a bunch of people who are different can have fun over their differences, instead of getting all offended.  
Title: Re: Good grammar
Post by: rjwoelk on January 14, 2019, 08:54:00 AM
Robert I dont have any trouble understanding you folks or even the french up here. In my guiding job I had it was the scottish troop that I had for 5 days that I was completely clueless on. But so were the British troops. They apparently could understand me. Lol
Title: Re: Good grammar
Post by: Andries on January 14, 2019, 10:33:54 AM
Yep, Yellowhammer mentions 'heavy Southern Speak'.
It's more than an accent, it's like another language. 
At Custom Sawyer's project get togethers in Georgia, there's a whole lot that gets said that flies right over my head.
My wife and I compare notes at the end of each day, to see which one of us has  figured out the most and the best expressions. 
"could you say that agin,  cause y'all talk so purdy". 
Dang, I'm such a charmer! . . . or maybe it's just that nobody understands a word that I say?
😆
Title: Re: Good grammar
Post by: Magicman on January 14, 2019, 11:18:08 AM
But I can read and understand what you write very well.  :P  :D
Title: Re: Good grammar
Post by: WV Sawmiller on January 14, 2019, 11:21:49 AM
Quote from: rjwoelk on January 14, 2019, 08:54:00 AMRobert I dont have any trouble understanding you folks or even the french up here. In my guiding job I had it was the scottish troop that I had for 5 days that I was completely clueless on. But so were the British troops. They apparently could understand me. Lol
Ditto that! I worked many overseas projects with several Scots and with that heavy broque I always had to have them repeat everything a time or two. In Norway I carpooled daily with a Scot - great guy, totally incomparable to understand.

Edit: Lynn, some languages are written in a standard form but spoken in different dialects. I understand that is the case with Chinese and know it was with Arabic. Saudi or Iraqi Arabic had a sound like a J while the Egyptians pronounced it as a G sound. When written all Arabic readers understood the meaning, when spoken not so much.
Title: Re: Good grammar
Post by: alan gage on January 14, 2019, 11:39:29 AM
Quote from: rjwoelk on January 13, 2019, 06:29:42 PM
I keep hearing people talk about what,
Me and (name of person involved did)
I was taught to say the persons name first. This seems to come from the now generation. The ones that feel intitled perhaps.  I guess not paying attention in grammar class.
Just feeling grouchy about it. Hope this is not the start of being a grouch old man.
It's not a hard and fast rule although most people think it is.
The way you determine whether to say "me and Johnny" as opposed to "Johnny and I" is to try leaving Johnny out of the sentence. You then add Johnny to either 'I' or 'me'.
For instance the sentence: "I went to the store" would turn into "Johnny and I went to the store."
But the sentence: "Would you like to go to the store with me" would turn into "Would you like to go to the store with me and Johnny?"
Alan
Title: Re: Good grammar
Post by: GAB on January 14, 2019, 11:47:59 AM
Mr. rjwoelk:
Sir if you are seeking a site with proper (whatever that is) grammer , punctuation, spelling, etc. I am sorry to have to inform you that you are not visiting the right site/forum.  Note: I'm guilty of all those offenses myself.
However if you are seeking information on many subjects you are on the right site/forum.

SS Logger:
Concerning your statement: "Oh look - I just set my hand into a fresh patty...."  In northern VT we refer to those as meadow muffins.

MM:
"Colloquial Redneck English"  Is there a dictionary for that and what is the ISBN #?
Now I was raised on a farm so I have heard all of the "words" and how to put them together when dealing with livestock.  Now I can say the same in both french and english.

Sawyer Ted:
Concerning your statement:  Nothing like being stuck to your boot tops and an angry angus bull giving you the side eye, stamping his foot and swinging his head!  If that had been my dad's bull he would have either gotten a ring in his nose and a 2 to 3 foot long piece of ΒΌ" chain (that usually helps in adjusting their attitude) or a one way ride to the slaughter house.

I spent 5 years as a service engineer for a power boiler manufacturer and spent some time in the south.  As time went on I got better at understanding what was said.  Seba Beach, Alberta in January is very cold, and Crystall River, Florida in June is hot. 

GAB
Title: Re: Good grammar
Post by: samandothers on January 14, 2019, 12:12:21 PM
Quote from: alan gage on January 14, 2019, 11:39:29 AM
For instance the sentence: "I went to the store" would turn into "Johnny and I went to the store."
But the sentence: "Would you like to go to the store with me" would turn into "Would you like to go to the store with me and Johnny?"
Alan
Alan,
I was with ya until this point.   In my learnin here in the south we always put others first!   So, 'Would you like to go to the store with Johnny and me?'    :D

Title: Re: Good grammar
Post by: rjwoelk on January 14, 2019, 01:44:29 PM
Gab i was not referin to this site. I was referin to people in public or were ever.  Here anything goes cause its mostly tongue in check expresions.  ;D
Title: Re: Good grammar
Post by: alan gage on January 14, 2019, 02:02:52 PM
Quote from: samandothers on January 14, 2019, 12:12:21 PM
Alan,
I was with ya until this point.   In my learnin here in the south we always put others first!   So, 'Would you like to go to the store with Johnny and me?'    :D
You might have a point there. I thought the original poster was concerned about people using 'me' instead of 'I' but rereading it I see they actually meant what you say here, that the other person should come first regardless of whether it's 'I' or 'me'.
Alan
Title: Re: Good grammar
Post by: rjwoelk on January 14, 2019, 02:26:30 PM
Allan
That is what i thought i said. Well it is what i ment. Yup you got it. :D
Title: Re: Good grammar
Post by: GAB on January 14, 2019, 02:53:03 PM
Quote from: rjwoelk on January 14, 2019, 01:44:29 PM
Gab i was not referin to this site. I was referin to people in public or were ever.  Here anything goes cause its mostly tongue in check expresions.  ;D
Sorry about that I sure misread it.
GAB
Title: Re: Good grammar
Post by: alan gage on January 14, 2019, 03:34:59 PM
Quote from: rjwoelk on January 14, 2019, 02:26:30 PM
Allan
That is what i thought i said. Well it is what i ment. Yup you got it. :D
Hope there wasn't any offense taken. I'd hate to upset a grouchy old man. :)
Alan
Title: Re: Good grammar
Post by: rjwoelk on January 14, 2019, 05:13:44 PM
No none taken, should have used better grammar.  :D
Well I was kind of mad at a company that builds massive sawmill buildings, malls etc, but will not build an in closed tarping shed for the truck drivers that go out of there on a daily bases, 45 below to 100 above they can careless about our welfare, but we need to all have our ppe on or else. Most times we need the loads reworked, as the securment of the load is impossible. Boy were the shipping ladies mad at me when they had to redo 2 loads (remove from my load to the other trailer)because of it. So I have informed my dispatch I will no longer darken their place of business.
Title: Re: Good grammar
Post by: John Mc on January 14, 2019, 05:42:57 PM
Quote from: samandothers on January 14, 2019, 12:12:21 PM
Quote from: alan gage on January 14, 2019, 11:39:29 AM
For instance the sentence: "I went to the store" would turn into "Johnny and I went to the store."
But the sentence: "Would you like to go to the store with me" would turn into "Would you like to go to the store with me and Johnny?"
Alan
Alan,
I was with ya until this point.   In my learnin here in the south we always put others first!   So, 'Would you like to go to the store with Johnny and me?'    :D
"Would you like to go to the store with Johnny and me?" is the gramatically correct sentence.
Title: Re: Good grammar
Post by: Skip on January 14, 2019, 06:03:27 PM
And that was his point from the first. :P
Title: Re: Good grammar
Post by: John Mc on January 14, 2019, 06:14:30 PM
Quote from: Skip on January 14, 2019, 06:03:27 PM
And that was his point from the first. :P
"...with me and Johnny" is not gramatically correct
Title: Re: Good grammar
Post by: gspren on January 14, 2019, 06:48:51 PM
Quote from: John Mc on January 14, 2019, 05:42:57 PM
Quote from: samandothers on January 14, 2019, 12:12:21 PM
Quote from: alan gage on January 14, 2019, 11:39:29 AM
For instance the sentence: "I went to the store" would turn into "Johnny and I went to the store."
But the sentence: "Would you like to go to the store with me" would turn into "Would you like to go to the store with me and Johnny?"
Alan
Alan,
I was with ya until this point.   In my learnin here in the south we always put others first!   So, 'Would you like to go to the store with Johnny and me?'    :D
"Would you like to go to the store with Johnny and me?" is the gramatically correct sentence.
My only question is "what store", or is it "which store".
Title: Re: Good grammar
Post by: Southside on January 14, 2019, 06:51:33 PM
Would y'all pick me up some Grits and Gizzards when you get to that thar store?  ;D
Title: Re: Good grammar
Post by: rjwoelk on January 14, 2019, 06:51:53 PM
Well i just think its disrespectful  by putting yourself first. Mom said so. :D
Title: Re: Good grammar
Post by: WDH on January 14, 2019, 08:39:11 PM
Andries,

Glaciation dulls ones ears. 
Title: Re: Good grammar
Post by: Andries on January 14, 2019, 11:52:16 PM
WDH: 
SAY WHAT?
STOP MUMBLING MAN, AND PASS ME MY DANG PARKA !
Title: Re: Good grammar
Post by: slider on January 15, 2019, 07:00:59 AM
Andries it is always good to see you and your wife at the project each year. I had no idea we were being charmed. Now that you have let the cat out of the bag we will be on guard.
Title: Re: Good grammar
Post by: alan gage on January 15, 2019, 10:46:36 AM
This got me curious because it never occurred to me whose name should come first. From what I found it's a matter of etiquette rather than grammar. The grammar police say it doesn't matter but the etiquette police say it does.

I can certainly be accused of not paying attention in grammar class but I never had an etiquette class so I guess that's my excuse. :)

Alan
Title: Re: Good grammar
Post by: terrifictimbersllc on January 15, 2019, 10:52:51 AM
Why would anyone go to the store with mean Johnny? ??? ???
Title: Re: Good grammar
Post by: samandothers on January 15, 2019, 11:06:44 AM
You guys ain't rite!  Y'all crack me up!
Title: Re: Good grammar
Post by: alan gage on January 15, 2019, 12:00:29 PM
Quote from: terrifictimbersllc on January 15, 2019, 10:52:51 AM
Why would anyone go to the store with mean Johnny? ??? ???
I was afraid he'd get insulted if I called him Johnny-ann.
Alan
Title: Re: Good grammar
Post by: sawguy21 on January 15, 2019, 12:06:11 PM
 I was taught to say " Do you want to come to the store with me" but when Johnny tagged along it became "Do you want to come to the store with Johnny and I". Language is constantly evolving, certain words, phrases, and structure become the norm and accepted speech. Still, I cringe when I hear somebody who should know better massacre the language.
Title: Re: Good grammar
Post by: moodnacreek on January 15, 2019, 01:10:16 PM
Northern Logger did an article about 'correct' woods English a while back. I do remember that a skidder or anything else that had been on fire was burnt [never burned]. Every body thinks the rebels talk different. I have been to sawmill auctions where people from Pa. and northern Vt. where hard to understand. Thank God we are not all the same, that would be boring.
Title: Re: Good grammar
Post by: WV Sawmiller on January 15, 2019, 06:41:54 PM
   Down South it is "y'all" or "you all" (Which can be used as singular or plural), in parts of New York and New Jersey it may be "Youse Guys" and I worked a project at the WV Northern Panhandle where it is about 5 miles separating Western PA and Eastern OH and there it was "You'uns"
Title: Re: Good grammar
Post by: moodnacreek on January 15, 2019, 07:01:39 PM
W.V., that's New York city exclusively, never upstate.
Title: Re: Good grammar
Post by: WDH on January 15, 2019, 07:34:00 PM
Y'all just ain't not right.  These Northerners get corrupted by glaciation.  And, to add to the insult, to eschew grits.  That just ain't right. 
Title: Re: Good grammar
Post by: WV Sawmiller on January 15, 2019, 07:42:15 PM
Moody,

 I stated parts of New York. You are absolutely right about Upstate New York. I think y'all should secede from the rest of the state. Actually there are some nice people in and around NYC but I will testify all the folks in the upper part of the state that I ever met were real fine folks. If they did not have that funny accent I would swear they were Southerners. I bet they actually like grits but they may not be able to admit it for fear of city spies visiting the area.
Title: Re: Good grammar
Post by: WDH on January 15, 2019, 07:49:44 PM
A man has to stand up against the opposition.  Northerners too.  Stand up for grits.  Even in Upstate New York, the frozen tundra. 
Title: Re: Good grammar
Post by: Andries on January 15, 2019, 07:50:24 PM
Quote from: WDH on January 15, 2019, 07:34:00 PM
. . . . to eschew grits. . .  
Ok, alright.
Finally, someone (named WDH) has finally told us how to eat grits.
We eschew them.
But then, that might be the BAD grammar that is the result of toooo much heat - gets the brain frazzled. 
Takes an entire winter to recover from that over 70 degree heat.  :D
Title: Re: Good grammar
Post by: Dave Shepard on January 15, 2019, 07:54:33 PM
Quote from: sawguy21 on January 15, 2019, 12:06:11 PM
I was taught to say " Do you want to come to the store with me" but when Johnny tagged along it became "Do you want to come to the store with Johnny and I". Language is constantly evolving, certain words, phrases, and structure become the norm and accepted speech. Still, I cringe when I hear somebody who should know better massacre the language.
That's how I was taught, as well. 
Title: Re: Good grammar
Post by: Old Greenhorn on January 15, 2019, 07:56:18 PM
How did this thread get so far off the rails so quickly. I wouldn't think you could even get here from there.
Title: Re: Good grammar
Post by: Southside on January 15, 2019, 08:02:43 PM
I see y'all still fixin to git to the store.  I am gonna milk the kews.   ;D
Title: Re: Good grammar
Post by: Andries on January 15, 2019, 08:06:20 PM
This thread has no rails.
It was started by a grouchy old truck driver in Sakatchewan.
He was venting about self centred millennials, or "load ladies" - which is polite and grammatically correct way to say very bad things. . . . and keep you out of the woodshed.
Then to topic went to grits, and food, and glaciated Tundra, and kews.
Which is all fair game in any thread.
Really, thread drift is kinda expected - which is bad grammar.
See what we mean?
Title: Re: Good grammar
Post by: Magicman on January 15, 2019, 08:10:32 PM
Quote from: samandothers on January 14, 2019, 12:12:21 PMAlan, I was with ya until this point. In my learnin here in the south we always put others first! So, 'Would you like to go to the store with Johnny and me?'
This is the English Grammar that I was taught. 
Title: Re: Good grammar
Post by: rjwoelk on January 15, 2019, 10:05:56 PM
This whole topic is off the rail.  Well you are right Andries. It started by a gumpy trucker who has been laughing ever since. I truly feel better. But I ant going to that place were they build steel structures any more. Then I will not need to get grumpy again. :D
Title: Re: Good grammar
Post by: Andries on January 15, 2019, 10:11:28 PM
rj - if you're ever passing through Winnipeg, drop in for a meal. 
. . . and I stand corrected. You're not a grumpy old trucker.
You're a trucker thats three years younger than me!  :)
Title: Re: Good grammar
Post by: petefrom bearswamp on January 16, 2019, 09:07:10 AM
Accents hard to understand?
Naw, I had a one sided conversation with Meadows Miller when he was at the pig roast a couple of years ago.
Couldnt understand much just nodded politely.
In early 1959 after forestry school I stayed in a rooming house in Weldon NC run by an elderly gentleman and I do mean gentleman, named Eugene Daniels.
Very hard to understand 
Then I went to the local diner run by a Greek fellow who asked if I wanted greets with my eggs.
A wonderful education on dialect for this naive northern boy.
Title: Re: Good grammar
Post by: Magicman on January 16, 2019, 09:36:59 AM
He could not help it if you talked funny.  :D
Title: Re: Good grammar
Post by: Chuck White on January 16, 2019, 10:33:03 AM
Quote from: WV Sawmiller on January 15, 2019, 07:42:15 PM
Moody,

I stated parts of New York. You are absolutely right about Upstate New York. I think y'all should secede from the rest of the state. Actually there are some nice people in and around NYC but I will testify all the folks in the upper part of the state that I ever met were real fine folks. If they did not have that funny accent I would swear they were Southerners. I bet they actually like grits but they may not be able to admit it for fear of city spies visiting the area.
I wish Cuomo would draw the line down the center of I-90 and then there would be a North New York and a South New York, that would eliminate a lot of OUR problems.
Title: Re: Good grammar
Post by: moodnacreek on January 16, 2019, 08:22:07 PM
Quote from: Southside logger on January 15, 2019, 08:02:43 PM
I see y'all still fixin to git to the store.  I am gonna milk the kews.   ;D
It ain't fixin no more, it's finnin!
Title: Re: Good grammar
Post by: moodnacreek on January 16, 2019, 08:28:51 PM
Chuck, herd the latest? Como wants to legalize marijuana but make it illegal to GROW IT!
Title: Re: Good grammar
Post by: Chuck White on January 17, 2019, 07:20:26 AM
Yeh, It has been all over the news lately!
Title: Re: Good grammar
Post by: Sixacresand on January 17, 2019, 09:21:45 AM
All I know I have asked several times to put somebody on a customer service line who I can understand.  Some millennial females I totally don't have a clue what they saying.  Recently I had to ask a cashier three time how much I owed. I could hear her fine, just couldn't comprehend it. I'm sure the problem lies with me.   
Title: Re: Good grammar
Post by: Andries on January 17, 2019, 11:18:00 AM
Quote from: moodnacreek on January 16, 2019, 08:28:51 PM
Chuck, herd the latest? Como wants to legalize marijuana but make it illegal to GROW IT!
It's been that way for a few months now up here.
Hasn't been any noticeable change in people's behaviour - and hasn't improved any bodies grammar either . . . 😆
Is Coumo (Como) an under cover Canadian?
Title: Re: Good grammar
Post by: sawguy21 on January 17, 2019, 11:29:19 AM
 :D
Title: Re: Good grammar
Post by: Chuck White on January 17, 2019, 09:21:52 PM
Can't really say what he is Andries, this is a family oriented Forum!

Just let your imagination go with it and you can figure out what most of the locals think of him!

When you get to the most populated areas it's viewed differently, and that's where he gets the votes that keep him in office!

'Nuff said!  ::)
Title: Re: Good grammar
Post by: SawyerTed on January 17, 2019, 10:19:13 PM
I spent time in Seattle back in the early 1980's.  A lot of folks were enthralled by my southern drawl.  Somehow I made a small fortune by collecting a dollar just to say "Y'all"!  And they thought I was "slow".   :D :D :D :D
Title: Re: Good grammar
Post by: Andries on January 17, 2019, 11:30:43 PM
Quote from: slider on January 15, 2019, 07:00:59 AM
Andries it is always good to see you and your wife at the project each year. I had no idea we were being charmed. Now that you have let the cat out of the bag we will be on guard.
@slider (http://forestryforum.com/board/index.php?action=profile;u=4302); see what can happen when a Southerner goes North?
@SawyerTed (http://forestryforum.com/board/index.php?action=profile;u=38503) calls it "enthralled", but really, he was laying on the charm.
His grammar got him the gold.  :D ;)
Now, you and Miss Vicky, you two are a superb example of Southern Charm.
Looking forward to this years 'Project'.
:)