The Forestry Forum

General Forestry => Chainsaws => Topic started by: logger444 on August 25, 2010, 11:29:58 PM

Title: new emissions compliant husky 372
Post by: logger444 on August 25, 2010, 11:29:58 PM
does any one have pics of the new 372 coming out. also do you know when they will be available? price? :P
Title: Re: new emissions compliant husky 372
Post by: Cut4fun on August 26, 2010, 01:50:36 PM
It's out and some dealers have on the shelves and some on FEEbay. Has de-comp on top instead of side, strato design.  Has 372xp X-Torque on sticker.

I have pics, but not going to re-size to post here sorry.
Title: Re: new emissions compliant husky 372
Post by: Warbird on August 26, 2010, 02:16:05 PM
Cut4fun, if you use the juploader, the pics are resized automatically for you.
Title: Re: new emissions compliant husky 372
Post by: SawTroll on August 29, 2010, 12:28:42 PM
Quote from: logger444 on August 25, 2010, 11:29:58 PM
does any one have pics of the new 372 coming out. also do you know when they will be available? price? :P

No, but I heard they are taller and a bit heavier than the original. I haven't seen any specs yet.
Title: Re: new emissions compliant husky 372
Post by: John Mc on August 29, 2010, 12:33:33 PM
How does the new 372 differ from the 576? I thought that was supposed to replace the 372??
Title: Re: new emissions compliant husky 372
Post by: Al_Smith on August 29, 2010, 12:38:58 PM
Quote from: Warbird on August 26, 2010, 02:16:05 PM
Cut4fun, if you use the juploader, the pics are resized automatically for you.
Well then exactly what is this "juploader " business . If it would ease the frustration of attempting to post a picture perhaps more would get posted.

Without casting espersions ,my attention span on hard to post pictures web sites is about 45 seconds long .
Title: Re: new emissions compliant husky 372
Post by: boobap on August 29, 2010, 10:50:53 PM
 :D
Quotemy attention span on hard to post pictures web sites is about 45 seconds long
:D

I would have to agree here Al_Smith, but yours is about 20.98 seconds longer than mine...

I haven't looked at the specs, but would Husky really make it more heavy. One would think that with technology progressing the way it does that they would stive to make it lighter?!?!
Title: Re: new emissions compliant husky 372
Post by: ladylake on August 30, 2010, 05:23:01 AM
 If it turned into a strato saw it would gain wieght .   Steve
Title: Re: new emissions compliant husky 372
Post by: John Mc on August 30, 2010, 09:49:01 AM
Quote from: ladylake on August 30, 2010, 05:23:01 AM
If it turned into a strato saw it would gain wieght .   Steve

I thought the Husky 560 was an auto-tune, strato saw that did not gain weight as compared to the 357XP it will replace? (or maybe I'm not remembering the specs - I know it is supposed to be lighter than the Stihl MS362)

John Mc
Title: Re: new emissions compliant husky 372
Post by: Warbird on August 30, 2010, 01:55:52 PM
Quote from: Al_Smith on August 29, 2010, 12:38:58 PM
Quote from: Warbird on August 26, 2010, 02:16:05 PM
Cut4fun, if you use the juploader, the pics are resized automatically for you.
Well then exactly what is this "juploader " business . If it would ease the frustration of attempting to post a picture perhaps more would get posted.

Without casting espersions ,my attention span on hard to post pictures web sites is about 45 seconds long .

LOL  Al, up near the top of any FF page (when you are logged in), click on "forum extras".  Then click on "Photo Galleries".  A new tab or window will open in your web browser.

On the left side of that window are some things you can click on.  One of them is "JUpload".  Stands for Java uploader.  Click it.  If a window pops up asking for access to your computer, allow it to.  You can trust this, since you are the one that initiated it.

It's pretty simple after that.  You click 'browse' in the little window that loaded, browse your computer to find the pics you want to share, select them, then click upload.

Once they've magically resized and uploaded for you, you have to tell it which one of your photo albums to put it in.  Then yer done!

It's really easy once you've been through it once.  If you get stuck on a part, drop me a line, I'll help you out.
Title: Re: new emissions compliant husky 372
Post by: Al_Smith on August 30, 2010, 04:26:38 PM
Thanks a million . I wish I had that info before . I don't do so good on forum software ,perhaps A-D-D or something ,mostly lack of patience I suppose would account  for more of it .
Title: Re: new emissions compliant husky 372
Post by: Warbird on August 30, 2010, 04:58:09 PM
Give it a shot and let me know if you have any difficulties.  Sometimes you have to make sure Java is loaded on your computer first.  Again, it ain't too bad and you'll think it's cake once you've gone through it once.
Title: Re: new emissions compliant husky 372
Post by: jteneyck on August 31, 2010, 03:44:59 PM
The method I use to post pictures here seems easier.  I post my pictures using Google Picasa, which is free photo software from Google, which allows you to upload your photos to your Google website which is free also.  I like free.  From there, you can share those photos or keep them private, your choice.  Anyway, I post pictures here by selecting the photo I want, then coping it's URL into my document here, highlighting the URL, and then clicking on the "Insert Image" icon above.  Works pretty easily, and I can post pictures to any forum, etc. while only having to upload the photos once. 
Title: Re: new emissions compliant husky 372
Post by: Al_Smith on August 31, 2010, 04:31:50 PM
 Don't confuse me now ,I 'm about half stupid on these things .Simple things for simple minds . --funny though,I can program a robot alright . ???
Title: Re: new emissions compliant husky 372
Post by: SawTroll on September 01, 2010, 07:18:15 PM
Quote from: John Mc on August 30, 2010, 09:49:01 AM
Quote from: ladylake on August 30, 2010, 05:23:01 AM
If it turned into a strato saw it would gain wieght .   Steve

I thought the Husky 560 was an auto-tune, strato saw that did not gain weight as compared to the 357XP it will replace? (or maybe I'm not remembering the specs - I know it is supposed to be lighter than the Stihl MS362)

John Mc

I believe that is a totally different design!   :)