The Forestry Forum

General Forestry => Chainsaws => Topic started by: CabinDweller on September 22, 2011, 01:54:44 PM

Title: Stihl 270 to 362 - Need advice
Post by: CabinDweller on September 22, 2011, 01:54:44 PM
I currently have an MS270 that's not quite two years old. I have absolutely no complaints about it at all. I just have an itch to get a new 362 (I am never satisfied :)). How much of an upgrade am I going to get in power? Is it going to be worth my $700? Thanks in advance.
Title: Re: Stihl 270 to 362 - Need advice
Post by: T Welsh on September 22, 2011, 05:39:58 PM
Cabin, throw a 20"dia.hunk of firewood in the truck and go to dealer and ask for a demo. saw it into little slivers,run his gas out of the tank. judge for yourself! wont cost you a dime. and who better than you can you trust! I love Stihl,s, good shopping. Tim
Title: Re: Stihl 270 to 362 - Need advice
Post by: Caloren on September 22, 2011, 06:19:50 PM
I am no expert on either saw, but you are going from about 50cc to 59cc, and approximatly 3.5 to 4.6 horsepower. Probably the best thing is you are going to a professional model which is probably built a little sturdier for extended use. Is it worth it? Only you can decide that.
Loren
Title: Re: Stihl 270 to 362 - Need advice
Post by: clww on September 22, 2011, 06:21:28 PM
I agree totally with T Welsh! Go to a good dealer and take one for a test drive.
Title: Re: Stihl 270 to 362 - Need advice
Post by: VT_Forestry on September 23, 2011, 11:23:41 AM
For what it's worth, more often than not I'm grabbing the 362 over any other saw at work.  It's a great balance of power and weight
Title: Re: Stihl 270 to 362 - Need advice
Post by: Cut4fun on September 23, 2011, 02:11:33 PM
Engine   2011 Stihl MS 362.............      2011 Stihl MS 270
Displacement   59.0 cc (3.6 cu. in.)...      50.0 cc (3.05 cu. in.)
Engine   (Power)3.4 kW (4.6 bhp)..      (Power) 2.5 kW (3.4 bhp)
Fuel Capacity   600 cc (20.3 oz.)......      520 cc (17.6 oz.)
Oil Capacity   325 cc (11.0 oz.)......      280 cc (9.5 oz.)
Chassis   2011 Stihl MS 362.....      2011 Stihl MS 270
Chain   3/8 RSC3   .........                    .325 RMC3
Dimensions   2011 Stihl MS 362.....      2011 Stihl MS 270
Weight PHO Flush-Cut: (13.0 lbs.)wrap-Handle 13.7 lbs.   5.3 kg (11.7 lbs.)
Bar Length   40 to 63 cm (16 to 25)    16- 20) STIHL ROLLOMATIC®

If I was going to carry the weight of a 362 and it's cost, I would go for a MS440 instead. I would buy a lighter MS361  before the 362 or just use the 270. Go compare like the others said.

361

# Displacement:  59 cc (3.6 cu in)
# Engine Power:  3.3 kW (4.4 bhp)
# Weight:  5.6 kg (12.3 lbs) - pho
# Fuel Capacity:  685 cc (23.2 oz )

440
70.7 cc   5.36 hp   13.5 lbs

Title: Re: Stihl 270 to 362 - Need advice
Post by: snowstorm on September 23, 2011, 06:03:42 PM
Quote from: CabinDweller on September 22, 2011, 01:54:44 PM
I currently have an MS270 that's not quite two years old. I have absolutely no complaints about it at all. I just have an itch to get a new 362 (I am never satisfied :)). How much of an upgrade am I going to get in power? Is it going to be worth my $700? Thanks in advance.
$700?????paid 600 for mine it runs really good
Title: Re: Stihl 270 to 362 - Need advice
Post by: CabinDweller on September 23, 2011, 09:32:28 PM
List is $689 with an 18" bar.
Title: Re: Stihl 270 to 362 - Need advice
Post by: John Mc on September 23, 2011, 10:14:46 PM
I'm holding out for a Husky 562 XP:
59.8 cc
3.5 KW (4.7 HP)
12.3 lbs
16-28" bar
AutoTune

Actually, I'd rather own the 560 XP (similar power, lighter weight, small mount bar instead of the large mount on the 562), but it seems they are not going to be sold in the US.
Title: Re: Stihl 270 to 362 - Need advice
Post by: Cut4fun on September 23, 2011, 11:23:22 PM
The 555 with small mount is being sold now. Only thing I see missing is the rev-boost and XP designation of the 560.
Title: Re: Stihl 270 to 362 - Need advice
Post by: CabinDweller on September 24, 2011, 03:38:07 PM
I picked up my new MS362 this morning. I did a little cutting with it today and I couldn't be more pleased (so far). We're off to a good start :)