The Forestry Forum

Sponsor News => LogRite Tools and Rite Leg Co => Topic started by: Rooster on April 04, 2013, 08:57:58 PM

Title: Possible "Won't Hook"
Post by: Rooster on April 04, 2013, 08:57:58 PM
I wanted to pitch this idea to you guys at Logrite...

This is a modified cant hook to be used for rolling timbers that you don't want to "bite" into and leave marks on finished beams.  The tip and the point of the hook are replaced with replaceable rubber skate stoppers.

As a timber-framer, I know that I would use one to roll timbers in the shop, at the jobsite, or off my friend's mill.

What are your thoughts?

Rooster



 (https://forestryforum.com/gallery/albums/userpics/15824/Won_t_Hook_2D01.jpg) 

 (https://forestryforum.com/gallery/albums/userpics/15824/bell-stopper-blk-500.jpg)
Title: Re: Possible "Won't Hook"
Post by: Dan_Shade on April 04, 2013, 10:26:22 PM
A heavy durometer rubber may do the trick, especially if it were molded to a bolt.  This would allow for easy replacement.

Title: Re: Possible "Won't Hook"
Post by: Okrafarmer on April 05, 2013, 01:08:57 AM
Yes, this is what I've been asking for, to ease the heavy slabs over on the mill. My hydraulic claw turner chews them up.
Title: Re: Possible "Won't Hook"
Post by: Tam-i-am on April 05, 2013, 09:45:08 AM
Kevin said it would be easy enough to try.  I'll keep on him. He is very busy right now as he is developing a new item for Stihl. Shh as it is top secret. ;D
Title: Re: Possible "Won't Hook"
Post by: Okrafarmer on April 05, 2013, 09:57:24 AM
Quote from: Tamiam on April 05, 2013, 09:45:08 AM
Kevin said it would be easy enough to try.  I'll keep on him. He is very busy right now as he is developing a new item for Stihl. Shh as it is top secret. ;D

"I'm getting one!"
"Pippin, you've had a whole half already!"
-- The Fellowship Of The Ring movie
Title: Re: Possible "Won't Hook"
Post by: r.man on April 20, 2013, 10:51:04 AM
Won't hook makes me think won't work, maybe Cant bite, Cant mark, Won't bite, so you don't have to say " pass me the cant hook with the rubber thingies on it".
Title: Re: Possible "Won't Hook"
Post by: Jeff on April 20, 2013, 11:24:48 AM
"The Gentle Hooker"
Title: Re: Possible "Won't Hook"
Post by: Okrafarmer on April 20, 2013, 11:28:00 AM
Cant hugger.

Cant catalyst.

"The diplomat"

Cant turner

Cant wrench
Title: Re: Possible "Won't Hook"
Post by: Okrafarmer on April 20, 2013, 11:28:43 AM
The Australian variant is a Cant Spanner.
Title: Re: Possible "Won't Hook"
Post by: Jeff on April 20, 2013, 11:29:56 AM
They already have a t-shirt that says "I'm a Logrite Hooker"  So my suggestion kinda already fits in. ;D


LogRite is AMERICAN
Title: Re: Possible "Won't Hook"
Post by: Okrafarmer on April 20, 2013, 11:41:11 PM
Quote from: Jeff on April 20, 2013, 11:29:56 AM

LogRite is AMERICAN

I realize that, but I meant they could export it to Australia and market it as the cant spanner. Since Australians say spanner instead of wrench, for some reason.
Title: Re: Possible "Won't Hook"
Post by: Jeff on April 21, 2013, 06:53:03 AM
In that case they could call it the gentle rooter.  :)
Title: Re: Possible "Won't Hook"
Post by: Okrafarmer on April 21, 2013, 10:14:55 PM
Whoa.  :-X
Title: Re: Possible "Won't Hook"
Post by: Tam-i-am on April 22, 2013, 10:20:10 AM
 :D
Title: Re: Possible "Won't Hook"
Post by: Rooster on April 22, 2013, 07:44:17 PM
Ha,Ha,Ha,...Good Times!

Can we get back on track now?

Is this concept something that you guys at Logrite might try to develope? 

My curiosity is killing me!!!

Thanks,

Rooster
Title: Re: Possible "Won't Hook"
Post by: beenthere on April 22, 2013, 08:02:55 PM
Quote from: Tamiam on April 05, 2013, 09:45:08 AM
Kevin said it would be easy enough to try.  I'll keep on him. He is very busy right now ...............

There is your answer, Rooster.   ;D
Title: Re: Possible "Won't Hook"
Post by: r.man on April 23, 2013, 07:40:21 AM
Would the piece on the bottom end of the handle be a snubbie?
Title: Re: Possible "Won't Hook"
Post by: Rooster on April 24, 2013, 07:55:36 AM
r.man,

What's your definition of a "snubbie"?

Sounds expensive and exotic!   :D

Rooster
Title: Re: Possible "Won't Hook"
Post by: Jeff on April 24, 2013, 12:30:22 PM
I'm afraid I started something I shouldn't have.  :D :D
Title: Re: Possible "Won't Hook"
Post by: Okrafarmer on April 25, 2013, 08:32:08 AM
We could talk about cant positioning devices.
Title: Re: Possible "Won't Hook"
Post by: Tam-i-am on April 25, 2013, 08:56:44 AM
Too much pressure ;D

Kevin ordered some rubber guards to test.
I'll keep you posted on how it works.

Title: Re: Possible "Won't Hook"
Post by: Okrafarmer on April 25, 2013, 11:46:06 PM
The rubber pads might need to be a little bigger, and/or straight-edged in shape.  ;)
Title: Re: Possible "Won't Hook"
Post by: Brad_bb on May 04, 2013, 02:01:18 PM
I burst out loud laughing when I read "The Gentle Hooker".

You know the old saying Rooster, you want something done or done right....
Title: Re: Possible "Won't Hook"
Post by: bandmiller2 on May 13, 2013, 07:50:56 AM
Try hockey pucks dirt cheap and available. Frank C.
Title: Re: Possible "Won't Hook"
Post by: Okrafarmer on June 10, 2013, 10:26:00 PM
I'm still scarring my cants. My customers don't like seeing the holes in the wood.  :-\
Title: Re: Possible "Won't Hook"
Post by: beenthere on June 10, 2013, 10:31:22 PM
Keep chasing it... you'll get it.
Title: Re: Possible "Won't Hook"
Post by: Dave Shepard on June 11, 2013, 11:07:34 AM
When sawing timbers and I have to roll with a cant hook, usually because they are 30' long or longer, I only put the hook in the last inch or two of timber. That way the hook holes will be docked off during framing.
Title: Re: Possible "Won't Hook"
Post by: thecfarm on June 11, 2013, 11:23:47 AM
I know you all are trying to add something to the point. But what about a strap wrench? I think that what it's called. I saw them at work to remove water filters canisters. I don't know if you could release it when the log was almost flipped over though.  :o
Title: Re: Possible "Won't Hook"
Post by: Brad_bb on June 14, 2013, 12:15:04 AM
thecfarm, I posted this a couple years ago:
(https://forestryforum.com/gallery/albums/userpics/16191/Timber_lever1b.jpg)

But I think Rooster was looking to try something quicker.  The strap has to be looped around the timber and the handle slid through each time.  A "can't hook" would theoretically drop right on the timber like a cant hook would.